The bumpy circle illusion: apparent shape-distortion of filled circles placed on a checkered pattern

Shuichiro Taya; Masaya Ishikawa

doi:10.47691/joi.v4.9658

Shuichiro Taya Hiyoshi Psychology Laboratory, Keio University Kanagawa, Japan https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1264-9635
Masaya Ishikawa design studio ‘cog’ Tokyo, Japan

DOI: https://doi.org/10.47691/joi.v4.9658

Keywords: curvature, luminance difference, shape perception, perceptual organization, convexity bias

Abstract

A new visual illusion in which circles placed on the checkered-pattern background appear to be polygons is reported. In this article, we first demonstrated that the apparent distortion of circles in this ‘bumpy circle illusion (BCI)’ depends on the luminance difference between the circles and the components of the background. Then, with the aim of clarifying the mechanism that causes this phenomenon, the ‘low-pass filtering theory’ the ‘segmentation theory’, the ‘corner effect theory’, and the ‘completion theory’ were investigated. As a result, the low-pass filtering theory and the completion theory were rejected because they predicted the occurrence of the illusion in some modulated BCI figures that produced no illusion. The ‘segmentation theory’, which postulated that the same mechanism as in the curvature blindness illusion produces BCI, was also rejected because the same luminance assignment as for BCI image components does not produce the curvature blindness illusion. In addition, the curvature of lines appears to deform in the curvature blindness illusion, whereas the BCI does not produce an illusion of line circles, which also shows the difference between the two phenomena. The ‘corner effect theory’ is the most promising because it correctly predicts (1) how the apparent distortion of the circles appears and (2) the presence/absence of illusion with the outline circles depending on the checkerboard luminance alteration cycles inside and outside of the circles. However, the corner effect theory can only be justified if it is assumed that the strength of the effect is different depending on whether the checkered pattern is applied to the inside or outside of the circles. Whether such asymmetry does exist and the reason why the asymmetry occurs needs further investigation.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Anderson, B. L., & Burr, D. C. (2018). Visual perception: To curve or not to curve. Current Biology, 28(4), R150–R152. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2018.01.037

Bell, J., Gheorghiu, E., Hess, R. F., & Kingdom, F. A. (2011). Global shape processing involves a hierarchy of integration stages. Vision Research, 51(15), 1760–1766. doi: 10.1016/j.visres.2011.06.003

Bertamini, M., & Kitaoka, A. (2018). Blindness to curvature and blindness to illusory curvature. i-Perception, 9(3), 2041669518776986. doi: 10.1177/2041669518776986

Carlson, C. R., Moeller, J. R., & Anderson, C. H. (1984). Visual illusions without low spatial frequencies. Vision Research, 24, 1407–1413. doi: 10.1016/0042-6989(84)90196-2

Carrasco, M., Figueroa, J. G., & Willen, J. D. (1986). A test of the spatial-frequency explanation of the Müller-Lyer illusion. Perception, 15(5), 553–562. doi: 10.1068/p150553

Coren, S., Ward, L. M., Porac, C., & Fraser, R. (1978). The effect of optical blur on visual-geometric illusions. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 11(6), 390–392. doi: 10.3758/BF03336863

Day, M., & Loffler, G. (2009). The role of orientation and position in shape perception. Journal of Vision, 9(10), 14. doi: 10.1167/9.10.14

Dumoulin, S. O., & Hess, R. F. (2007). Cortical specialization for concentric shape processing. Vision Research, 47(12), 1608–1613. doi: 10.1016/j.visres.2007.01.031

Fraser, J. (1908). A new visual illusion of direction. British Journal of Psychology, 2, 307–320. doi: 10.1111/j.2044-8295.1908.tb00182.x

Gheorghiu, E., & Kingdom, F. A. (2006). Luminance-contrast properties of contour-shape processing revealed through the shape-frequency after-effect. Vision Research, 46(21), 3603–3615. doi: 10.1016/j.visres.2006.04.021

Ginsburg, A. P. (1986). Spatial filtering and visual form perception. In K. R. Boff, L. Kaufman, & J. P. Thomas (Eds.), Handbook of perception and human performance, Vol. 2. Cognitive processes and performance (pp. 1–41). John Wiley & Sons.

Ginsburg, A. P., & Evans, D. W. (1979). Predicting visual illusions from filtered images based upon biological data. Journal of the Optical Society of America, 69, 1443.

Gregory, R. L., & Heard, P. (1979). Border locking and the Café Wall illusion. Perception, 8, 365–380. doi: 10.1068/p080365

Ishikawa, M. (2018). The bumpy circle illusion, Abstract for the 3rd prize in the 10th visual illusion and auditory illusion contest in Japan, Retrieved from http://www.psy.ritsumei.ac.jp/~akitaoka/sakkon/Ishikawa2018-explanatoin.pdf (in Japanese)

Ito, H. (2012). Cortical shape adaptation transforms a circle into a hexagon: A novel afterimage illusion. Psychological Science, 23(2), 126–132. doi: 10.1177/0956797611422236

Ito, M., & Komatsu, H. (2004). Representation of angles embedded within contour stimuli in area V2 of macaque monkeys. Journal of Neuroscience, 24(13), 3313–3324. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4364-03.2004

Kanizsa G., & Gerbino W. (1976). Convexity and symmetry in figure-ground organization. In (ed.), M. Henle Vision and Artifact (pp. 25–32). New York: Springer.

Kawabe, T., Qian, K., Yamada, Y., & Miura, K. (2010). The jaggy diamonds illusion. Perception, 39(4), 573–576. doi: 10.1068/p6617

Kramer, D., & Fahle, M. (1996). A simple mechanism for detecting low curvatures. Vision Research, 36(10), 1411–1419. doi: 10.1016/0042-6989(95)00340-1

Kitaoka, A. (1998). Apparent contraction of edge angles. Perception, 27, 1209–1219. doi: 10.1068/p271209

Levi, D. M., & Klein, S. A. (2000). Seeing circles: What limits shape perception? Vision Research, 40(17), 2329–2339. doi: 10.1016/S0042-6989(00)00092-4

Loffler, G. (2008). Perception of contours and shapes: Low and intermediate stage mechanisms. Vision Research, 48(20), 2106–2127. doi: 10.1016/S0042-6989(00)00092-4

McCourt, M. E. (1982). A spatial frequency dependent grating-induction effect. Vision Research, 22(1), 119–134. doi: 10.1016/0042-6989(82)90173-0

Morgan, M. J., & Moulden, B. (1986). The Münsterberg figure and twisted cords. Vision Research, 26(11), 1793–1800. doi: 10.1016/0042-6989(86)90130-6

Moulden, B., & Renshaw, J. (1979). The Münsterberg illusion and ‘irradiation’. Perception, 8(3), 275–301. doi: 10.1068/p080275

Oppel, J. J. (1855). Uüber geometrisch-optische Taüuschungen [About geometrical-optical illusions]. Jahresbericht des physikalischen Vereins zu Frankfurt am Main, 37–47.

Pasupathy, A., & Connor, C. E. (1999). Responses to contour features in macaque area V4. Journal of Neurophysiology, 82(5), 2490–2502. doi: 10.1152/jn.1999.82.5.2490

Pierce, A. H. (1898). The illusion of the kindergarten patterns. Psychological Review, 5(3), 233–253. doi: 10.1037/h0070595

Qian, K., & Mitsudo, H. (2016). Eggs illusion: Local shape deformation generated by a grid pattern. Journal of Vision, 16(15), 27. doi: 10.1167/16.15.27

Qian, K., & Mitsudo, H. (2019). Role of orientation processing in the eggs illusion. Perception, 48(12), 1197–1213. doi: 10.1177/0301006619878954

Qian, K., & Mitsudo, H. (2020). Spatial dynamics of the eggs illusion: Visual field anisotropy and peripheral vision. Vision Research, 177, 12–19. doi: 10.1016/j.visres.2020.08.008

Singh, M. (2004). Modal and amodal completion generate different shapes. Psychological Science, 15(7), 454–459. doi: 10.1111/j.0956-7976.2004.00701.x

Subirana-Vilanova, J. B., & Richards, W. (1996). Attentional frames, frame curves and figural boundaries: The inside/outside dilemma. Vision Research, 36(10), 1493–1501. doi: 10.1016/0042-6989(95)00274-X

Takahashi, K. (2017). Curvature blindness illusion. i-Perception, 8(6), 2041669517742178. doi: 10.1177/2041669517742178

Wade, N. (1982). The art and science of visual illusions. London: Routledge Kegan & Paul.

Ward, L. M., & Coren, S. (1976). The effect of optically induced blur on the magnitude of the Mueller-Lyer illusion. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 7(5), 483–484. doi: 10.3758/BF03337255

Zhou, H., Friedman, H. S., & Von Der Heydt, R. (2000). Coding of border ownership in monkey visual cortex. Journal of Neuroscience, 20(17), 6594–6611. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.20-17-06594.2000